Turkish Journal of Nephrology
Original Articles

Prediction of Recurrence and Graft Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with IgA Nephropathy: Role of Genetic and Oxidative Stress Markers

1.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

2.

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye

3.

Department of Genetics, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye

4.

Department of Pathology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

5.

Department of Medical Biology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye

6.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA

Turkish J Nephrol 2025; 34: 139-148
DOI: 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2025.24885
Read: 104 Downloads: 63 Published: 15 April 2025

Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) recurrence after kidney transplantation (KTx) could cause allograft loss. New biomarkers are needed to assess the risk of IgAN recurrence and allograft dysfunction following KTx.

Methods: Thirty-seven KTx recipients who underwent KTx between 2002-2011 with biopsy-confirmed pre-transplant IgAN were evaluated in this retrospective study. Demographics, pathological and clinical/laboratory findings, and biomarkers, including levels of advanced oxidative protein products (AOPP) and galactose-deficient IgA1 and 4 tag single-nucleotide variants (tSNVs) associated with IgAN, were recorded. The primary outcome was IgAN recurrence. Biopsy-proven allograft rejection (BPAR) and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) were secondary outcomes.

Results: 72.9% of patients were male. The mean age of KTx recipients was 37.4 ± 9.9 years. 45.9% of them experienced a recurrence of IgAN, during a median of 125 months of follow-up. There were more male donors in the recurrent IgAN group (P = .022). The median levels of UPCR were higher (P = .002) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were lower (P = .007) at the time of sampling in the recurrent group. Donor sex (male) (P = .018, HR: 3.853, 95% CI: 1.256-11.826) and eGFR at sampling (P = .039, HR: 0.967, 95% CI: 0.937-0.998) were predictors of IgAN recurrence in Cox regression analysis. Advanced oxidative protein products (median 78.4 vs 67.35 (µmol/L)) and Gd-IgA1 (median 5390.3 vs 4732.5 ng/µL) levels were insignificantly elevated in the patients with IgAN recurrence. Statistical differences were not present in terms of secondary outcomes between the patients with and without IgAN recurrence. Single-nucleotide variants were not statistically associated with the recurrence of IgAN.

Conclusions: Prospective biomarker/genetic marker studies, including large patient cohorts, are required to evaluate the risk of IgAN recurrence and allograft function after KTx.

Cite this article as: Dirim AB, Mirioglu S, Oto OA, et al. Prediction of recurrence and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with IgA nephropathy: role of genetic and oxidative stress markers. Turk J Nephrol. 2025;34(2):139-148.

Files
EISSN 2667-4440